<html>
<head><title>DATA ANALYSIS FOR TRACING THE PARABOLA</title>
</head>

<body>
<h1>DATA ANALYSIS FOR TRACING THE PARABOLA</h1>
<p>
<A href="paragraph.gif"> 
<img src="paragraph_small.gif"><h3> graph
</h3> </A> of
the curves and data points
<p>
The yellow circles are the data points.  The purple(ish) line is the straight
line.  The blue-green curve is the parabola.  The red curve which intersects
every data point is the "curve".
<p>
If the path of the projectile was a straight line, a straight line should 
fit the data best and if the path of the projectile was a parabola, an 
equation having the basic properties of a parabola would fit the data best.
<p>
Using linear regression, the best fits were:
<pre>
y:horz dist    x:vert fall
Type graph     Equation                            Corr Coef*
straight line: y= 0.47x + 7.39                      0.9951
parabola     : y= 4.26(x^0.5)   [x=(0.235y)^2]      0.9998
curve        : y= 3.53(x^0.537) [x=(0.282y)^1.86]   0.9999
</pre>
<p>
*Corr Coef = correlation coefficient : tells how closely the equation 
reflects the data.
<p>
I used linear regression a third time to determine exactly what type if 
curve would fit the data most closely.  This curve is almost a parabola.
<p>
From the correlation coefficient and the graph it is obvious that the 
parabola fits the data much more closely than the straight line.
<p><hr><p>
<h3>Links</h3>
<ul>
<li><A href="experiment2.html"> <img src="gang-t.jpeg"> Experiment
Group Home Page </A>
<li> <a href="paraintr.html"> Parabola Introduction</a>
<li> <A href="paexintr.html"> Parabola
Experiment Introduction </A>
<li> <a href="parabola_procedure.html"> Parabola Experiment Procedure</a>
<li> <A href="parabola_data.html"> Parabola Experiment Data </A>
<li> <a href="padaan1.html"> Parabola Experiment Data Analysis, part 1</a>
</ul> 
<p>

<hr><pre>
<i>written by:</i> Sharmaine Jennings
<i>email address: </i> vanese@owlnet.rice.edu
last revised: April 17, 1995
</pre>
</body>
</html>

