<html><!-- #BeginTemplate "/Templates/main_nav.dwt" --><!-- DW6 -->
<head>
<!-- #BeginEditable "doctitle" --> 
<title>The Galileo Project | Science | Christoph Scheiner </title>
<!-- #EndEditable -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/galileostyles.css" type="text/css">
</head>

<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#626E8B" link="#858893" vlink="#858893" alink="#858893">
<table width="625" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
  <tr> 
    <td colspan="3">
	
	<!-- logo -->
	
	<!--#include virtual="/galileo_header.shtm" -->

	
	</td>
  </tr>
  <tr> 
    <td width="169" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"> 
      
	  <!-- navigation bar -->
	
	<!--#include virtual="/galileo_sidebar.shtm" -->

	  
    </td>
    <td width="50" rowspan="2">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="403" align="left" valign="middle" height="33"><!-- #BeginEditable "location" -->
	  <div class="unav"> <a href="../index.html">The Galileo Project</a> &gt; 
        <a href="../science.html">Science</a> &gt; <a href="scheiner.html">Christoph Scheiner</a></div>
	  <!-- #EndEditable --></td>
  </tr>
  <tr> 
    <td width="403" align="left" valign="top"><!-- #BeginEditable "main_text" --> 
      <p class="heading">Christoph Scheiner (1573-1650)</p>
      <p class="main_text">Christoph Scheiner was born in Wald, near Mindelheim 
        in Swabia (southwest Germany), on 25 July 1573. He attended the <a href="../lib/glossary.html#jesuits">Jesuit</a> 
        Latin school in Augsburg, continued his studies in the Jesuit college 
        at Landsberg, and entered the Jesuit order in 1595. Having completed his 
        preparatory study, he entered the university at Ingolstadt in 1600. Here 
        he studied metaphysics and devoted himself to the study of mathematics. 
        In 1610 he joined the faculty of the Jesuit college of the university 
        as professor of Mathematics and Hebrew. 
      <p class="main_text"> Scheiner's talents lay in the mathematical sciences 
        and instruments. Early in his career he became an expert on the mathematics 
        of sundials and also invented a pantograph (a device for copying and enlarging 
        drawings). Upon hearing about Galileo's discoveries with the telescope, 
        in 1610, Scheiner immediately set out to obtain good telescopes with which 
        to scrutinize the heavens. After verifying Galileo's discoveries for himself, 
        he turned his attention to the Sun, where, in March or April 1611, he 
        discovered <A HREF="observations/sunspots.html"> sunspots</A>. He was 
        neither the first to observe sunspots nor the first to publish on the 
        subject, but his publication was the start of a controversy with Galileo 
        over the nature of sunspots. 
      <p class="main_text"> Because of the conservative stand of the Jesuit order 
        on cosmological issues, Scheiner attempted to rescue the perfection of 
        the Sun, and by implication the heavens generally, from imperfection. 
        He therefore postulated that sunspots were caused by satellites of the 
        Sun whose shadows are projected on to Sun's disk as they cross in front 
        of it. His tract, <i>Tres Epistolae de Maculis Solaribus</i> ("Three Letters 
        on Solar Spots") appeared in Augsburg early in 1612, under the pseudonym 
        "Apelles latens post tabulam," or "Apelles hiding behind the painting." 
        These letters were written to <A HREF="welser.html">Marc Welser</A>, an 
        Augsburg banker and scholar who was a friend and patron to Jesuit scholars. 
      <p class="main_text"> Welser invited Galileo to comment on these letters, 
        and Galileo responded with two letters to Welser of his own in which he 
        argued that sunspots are on or near the surface of the Sun, that they 
        change their shapes, that they are often seen to originate on the solar 
        disk and perish there, and that therefore the Sun is not perfect. In the 
        meantime, Scheiner had written two further letters to Welser on this subject, 
        and after reading Galileo's first letter he wrote yet another. This second 
        series of three letters was published by Welser in the fall of 1612, with 
        the title <i>De Maculis Solaribus et Stellis circa Iovis Errantibus Accuratior 
        Disquisition</i> ("A More Accurate Disquisition Concerning Solar Spots 
        and Stars [i.e., Satellites] Wandering around Jupiter"). Again, Scheiner 
        used the pseudonym of Apelles. Scheiner restated his argument that sunspots 
        were caused by satellites and argued that Jupiter had more satellites 
        than the four discovered by Galileo. Upon reading this tract, Galileo 
        wrote yet a third sunspot letter to Welser, dated December 1612, and in 
        1613 the <a href="../gal/lincei.html">Lyncean Academy</a>published all 
        three letters under the title <i>Istoria e Dimostrazioni intorno alle 
        Macchie Solari e loro Accidenti</i> ("History and Demonstrations Concerning 
        Sunspots and their Properties.") A third of the copies contained reprints 
        of Scheiner's two tracts. Although he was polite to Scheiner, Galileo 
        refuted his arguments and there was little doubt as to who was the winner 
        of this dispute. 
      <p class="main_text"> Scheiner went on to publish books on atmospheric refraction 
        and the optics of the eye, and in these works he built on the optical 
        achievements of <A HREF="kepler.html">Johannes Kepler</A>, thus providing 
        important material for later writers on the subject. He also continued 
        his research on sunspots. In the meantime, he had begun instructing Arch 
        Duke Maximilian, brother of Emperor Rudolph II, in the mathematical subjects, 
        and in 1616 he left Ingolstadt for good to become Maximilain's advisor. 
        Scheiner henceforth had the patronage of the Emperor's brother and in 
        1621 he became the confessor of Arch Duke Karl, brother of the new Emperor, 
        Ferdinand II. One of Scheiner's greatest achievements was the foundation 
        of a new Jesuit college in Neisse in Silesia. When the Arch Duke died 
        on a voyage to Spain in 1624, Scheiner went to Rome, where he stayed for 
        the next eight years. It was in Rome that he published his greatest work, 
        <i>Rosa Ursina</i> (1630), the standard work on sunspots for more than 
        a century. 
      <p class="main_text"> In his <i>Assayer</i> of 1623, Galileo had made certain 
        disparaging remarks about those who had tried to steal his priority of 
        discovery of celestial phenomena. Although Galileo almost certainly had 
        others in mind, Scheiner interpreted these remarks as being directed against 
        him. He therefore devoted the first book of <i>Rosa Ursina</i> to an all 
        out attack on Galileo, and it has been said that his enmity toward Galileo 
        was instrumental in starting the process against the Florentine in 1633. 
        Scheiner's diatribe against Galileo does, however, not take away from 
        the importance of <i>Rosa Ursina</i>. Here Scheiner agreed with Galileo 
        that sunspots are on the Sun's surface or in its atmosphere, that they 
        are often generated and perish there, and that the Sun is therefore not 
        perfect. Scheiner further advocated a fluid heavens (against the Aristotelian 
        solid spheres), and he pioneered new ways of representing the motions 
        of spots across the Sun's face. Because shortly after the appearance of 
        <i>Rosa Ursina</i> sunspot activity decreased drastically (the so-called 
        Maunder Minimum, ca. 1645-1710), his work was not superseded until well 
        into the eighteenth century. 
      <p class="main_text"> In 1633 Scheiner returned to the German region, where 
        he spent the rest of his life in Vienna and Neisse, supervising the building 
        of the Jesuit college. Until the end, he worked on a massive refutation 
        of the <A HREF="theories/copernican_system.html">Copernican theory</A>, 
        the finished part of which was published posthumously, in 1650, under 
        the title <i>Prodromus pro Sole Mobili et Terra Stabili contra Galilaeum 
        a Galileis</i> ("Introductory Treatise in Favor of a Moving Sun and a 
        Stable Earth against Galileo Galilei"). The work remained virtually unkown 
        and had no effect on the outcome of the debate between Copernicans and 
        advocates of the geocentric/geostatic cosmology.</p>
      <table width="100%" border="0">
        <tr>
          <td><div align="center"><a href="../images/things/scheiner_rosa_ursina1-l.gif"><img src="../images/things/scheiner_rosa_ursina1-t.gif" width="117" height="130" border="0"></a><a href="../images/things/scheiner_rosa_ursina2-l.gif"><img src="../images/things/scheiner_rosa_ursina2-t.gif" width="121" height="130" border="0"></a><a href="../images/things/scheiner_rosa_ursina3-l.gif"><img src="../images/things/scheiner_rosa_ursina3-t.gif" width="125" height="130" border="0"></a></div></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td height="21"><div align="center" class="caption">Sunspots (Rosa Ursina, 
              1630)</div></td>
        </tr>
      </table>
      <p class="sources"><strong>Sources</strong>: William R. Shea, "Scheiner, 
        Christoph," <i>Dictionary of Scientific Biography</i>; <i>idem</i>, "Scheiner, 
        and the Interpretation of Sunspots," <i>Isis</i>, 61 (1970):498-519; <i>idem</i>, 
        "Galileo, Sunspots and Inconstant Heavens," a chapter in his book, <i>Galileo's 
        Intellectual Revolution; Middle Period (1610-1632)</i> (New York: Science 
        History Publications, 1972), pp. 49-74. Stillman Drake, "Sunspots, Sizzi, 
        and Scheiner," <i>Galileo studies: personality, tradition, and revolution</i> 
        (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1970), pp. 177-199; Grant McColly, 
        "Christoph Scheiner and the Decline of neo-Aristotelianism," <i>Isis</i>, 
        32 (1940):63-69; Jean Dietz Moss, "The Significance of the Sunspot Question," 
        a chapter in her book <i>Novelties in the Heavens: Rhetoric and Science 
        in the Copernican Controversy</i> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 
        1993), pp. 97-125.</p>
      <!-- #EndEditable --></td>
  </tr>
  <tr> 
    <td width="169" align="left" valign="top" height="15">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="53" height="15">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="403" height="15">&nbsp;</td>
  </tr>
  <tr> 
    <td width="169" align="left" valign="top">

<!-- copyright, last updated -->

<!--#include virtual="/copy_update.shtm" -->


    </td>
    <td width="53">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="403" align="center" valign="top"> 
      
	  <!-- bottom navigation bar -->

<!--#include virtual="/galileo_bottomnav.shtm" -->
	  
	  
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>
</body>
<!-- #EndTemplate --></html>
